Pendidikan sebagai Sistem: Systematic Literature Review tentang Keterkaitan Input, Proses, dan Output Pendidikan

Authors

Keywords:

Pendidikan Sebagai Sistem, Input, Proses, Output, Outcome, Mutu Pendidikan, SLR

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pendidikan sebagai sistem, komponen utamanya, serta hubungan input, proses, output, dan outcome dalam meningkatkan mutu pendidikan. Penelitian menggunakan metode Systematic Literature Review (SLR) dengan menganalisis 20 artikel ilmiah terbitan 2021–2026. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa mutu pendidikan dipengaruhi oleh keterkaitan antara input, seperti guru, peserta didik, kurikulum, fasilitas, dan pembiayaan; proses berupa pembelajaran, pengelolaan, dan evaluasi; output berupa hasil belajar dan kompetensi lulusan; serta outcome berupa keberhasilan lulusan dalam melanjutkan pendidikan, memasuki dunia kerja, dan berkontribusi kepada masyarakat. Oleh karena itu, peningkatan mutu pendidikan memerlukan pengelolaan seluruh komponen secara terpadu dan berkelanjutan.

References

Ashraf, M. A., & Ahmed, A. (2022). Approaches to quality education in tertiary sector: An empirical study using PLS-SEM. Education Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5491496

Cao, Y., Yao, X., & Zhang, G. (2025). How to assess global education quality: The Global Education Quality Index and its cross-national comparisons. Journal of Education and Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311251331107

Diana Devi, A. (2021). Analisis mutu dan kualitas input-proses-output pendidikan di MAN 1 Tulang Bawang Barat. Al-Fahim: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.54396/alfahim.v3i1.115

Efendi, M., Asha, L., & Wanto, D. (2024). Deciphering the challenges of madrasah education quality management: Overview of input-process-output. Educational Leadership: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 3(2), 240–254. https://doi.org/10.24252/edu.v3i2.43721

Gümüş, S. (2022). School leadership and achievement gaps based on socioeconomic status: A search for socially just instructional leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(4), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-11-2021-0213

Kemethofer, D., et al. (2023). Examining the trident: How data from the PISA study can be used to identify associations among context, school leadership and student outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 61(2), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2022-0030

Kharisma, R., Syamsuri, & Achmadi. (2026). Transformation of education quality based on education report card: Longitudinal input-process-output (IPO) analysis in junior high school. Journal of Language and Literature Education.

Li, G., & Xin, T. (2021). The definition of quality of basic education and the theoretical model for quality monitoring and evaluation. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 39(4), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.04.002

Li, L., Zhu, H., & Li, H. (2022). School leadership enhances secondary students' achievement in rural China through teacher commitment and collaborative culture. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894688

Mardiana, & Anwar, C. (2025). Teacher competence and student learning outcomes: A correlational study in primary education. Journal of Literacy Education, 1(3), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.64780/jole.v1i3.88

Najah, L., & Wahyuni, H. C. (2025). Quality management in Islamic high school education: A case study. Adabiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.21070/adabiyah.v6i1.1740

Regel, J. (2022). Ownership in international vocational education and training transfer: The example of quality development in India. International Journal of Training and Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12290

Sakulwichitsintu, S. (2023). Mobile technology – An innovative instructional design model in distance education. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 17(7), 4–31. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i07.36457

Sidik, F. (2022). Input, process and output system theory approach in educational institutions. Irfani, 18(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.30603/ir.v18i1.2658

Smith, E., & Gümüş, S. (2022). Socioeconomic achievement gaps and the role of school leadership: Addressing within- and between-school inequality in student achievement. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101951

Sriarunrasmee, J., & Seekheio, D. (2024). The development of a support system for the follow-up on basic education quality assessment and accreditation. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(7), 532–539. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i7.6717

Suandi, A. (2023). Enhancing character education through Total Quality Management: An empirical study in the Faculty of Education. MANAGERIA: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam. https://doi.org/10.14421/manageria.2023.81-04

Suprojo, D. S., Sutama, & Sutopo, A. (2024). Manajemen mutu satuan pendidikan: Analisis terhadap input, proses, output dan outcome SMA Muhammadiyah Purwodadi. Teaching and Learning Journal of Mandalika, 6(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.36312/teacher.v6i1.4052

Sundari, S., Egar, N., & Purwosaputro, S. (2025). Pengaruh penerapan manajemen terpadu, kompetensi professional guru dan partisipasi orang tua terhadap mutu MTs Swasta se-Batang Timur. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar. https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i01.21836

Suwartini, S., & Sutama. (2023). Input-process-output-outcome quality in managing education in elementary schools. Primary: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 12(2), 510–522. https://doi.org/10.33578/jpfkip.v12i2.9620

Garira, E. (2020). A proposed unified conceptual framework for quality of education in schools. SAGE Open, 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019899445

Published

2026-08-14